<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cultural Learnings of Holland for Make Benefit Glorious Nation of America</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boredgayboy.com/2006/11/08/cultural-learnings-of-holland-for-make-benefit-glorious-nation-of-kazakhstan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boredgayboy.com/2006/11/08/cultural-learnings-of-holland-for-make-benefit-glorious-nation-of-kazakhstan/</link>
	<description>brought to you by Qr Magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:34:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://boredgayboy.com/2006/11/08/cultural-learnings-of-holland-for-make-benefit-glorious-nation-of-kazakhstan/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qrmag.com/blog/2006/11/08/cultural-learnings-of-holland-for-make-benefit-glorious-nation-of-kazakhstan/#comment-398</guid>
		<description>great song, lots of courage.  sort of heartwarming when it comes down to kids singing about it.

being the kind of person who plainly desires function, i don&#039;t know whether i&#039;d just let them called it &#039;civil unions,&#039; as long as it incorporates all the rights of marriage, or actually want to fight all the way to get title of &#039;marriage&#039;.  (yes, it would be nice to get the title, but if it comes down to whether the word &#039;marriage&#039; is a &#039;religious&#039; icon, eh.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great song, lots of courage.  sort of heartwarming when it comes down to kids singing about it.</p>
<p>being the kind of person who plainly desires function, i don&#8217;t know whether i&#8217;d just let them called it &#8216;civil unions,&#8217; as long as it incorporates all the rights of marriage, or actually want to fight all the way to get title of &#8216;marriage&#8217;.  (yes, it would be nice to get the title, but if it comes down to whether the word &#8216;marriage&#8217; is a &#8216;religious&#8217; icon, eh.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://boredgayboy.com/2006/11/08/cultural-learnings-of-holland-for-make-benefit-glorious-nation-of-kazakhstan/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://qrmag.com/blog/2006/11/08/cultural-learnings-of-holland-for-make-benefit-glorious-nation-of-kazakhstan/#comment-397</guid>
		<description>The Democrats are going to screw this nation up.  They want to open the borders and let everyone from around the world to come here.  That will in turn prolong gay equality because the overwhelming majority are anti-gay.  Even if they weren&#039;t anti-gay I still would be against open borders.  It&#039;s not Americans responsibility to give foreigners jobs.  Secondly, Democrats/liberals don&#039;t believe terrorism exists.  Everything terrorists want, Democrats support.  Lastly, the Democrats only mildly support gay rights overall.  Howard Dean had a chance to pass marraige for gay people in Vermont but instead chose civil unions because it might hurt his presidential hopes in 04.  If it wasn&#039;t for gay people&#039;s money we wouldn&#039;t even be in the game.  They think of gay rights as a drag on winning political office that&#039;s why many of the new democrats are anti-gay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrats are going to screw this nation up.  They want to open the borders and let everyone from around the world to come here.  That will in turn prolong gay equality because the overwhelming majority are anti-gay.  Even if they weren&#8217;t anti-gay I still would be against open borders.  It&#8217;s not Americans responsibility to give foreigners jobs.  Secondly, Democrats/liberals don&#8217;t believe terrorism exists.  Everything terrorists want, Democrats support.  Lastly, the Democrats only mildly support gay rights overall.  Howard Dean had a chance to pass marraige for gay people in Vermont but instead chose civil unions because it might hurt his presidential hopes in 04.  If it wasn&#8217;t for gay people&#8217;s money we wouldn&#8217;t even be in the game.  They think of gay rights as a drag on winning political office that&#8217;s why many of the new democrats are anti-gay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
